Implementation of Interoperable Incident Data Interfaces (UCRI, WDX3 & EDXL-SitRep) #5
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Problem Description
Currently, incident reports must be filled out manually. To increase efficiency and data quality, the system should be able to receive incident data from CAD systems automatically.
Proposed Solution
Implement a modular interface architecture that supports modern standards (UCRI), legacy formats (WDX3), and an optional internal data model.
Core Requirements
UCRI Implementation
Implement a REST-compliant endpoint following the UCRI (Universal Control Room Interface) standard (JSON-based).
WDX3 Legacy Support
Create a "Compatibility Ingestor" for WDX3 (XML).
Since WDX3 varies by vendor, this should be implemented as a transformational middleware/module that maps XML fields to our internal data model.
Internal Generic Ingest API
A dedicated, well-documented JSON-API that reflects the internal data model.
This interface should be the most comprehensive, allowing data fields that might not be covered by UCRI.
Alignment with EDXL-SitRep (Situation Reporting) logic for structured situational updates.
Automated Reporting & PDF Workflow
Incoming data should pre-fill the incident report.
If no PDF is provided, trigger the internal PDF-Generator to create a draft report based on the received metadata.